MEDIA RELEASE: First Asian City Wins 11th Annual Innovation Cities™ Index City Rankings from 500 cities
innovationcitiesindex.substack.com
MEDIA RELEASE | ABOUT 2thinknow | NOTES FOR EDITORS | CITY RANKINGS TABLES Robot Capital Tokyo Wins 11th Annual City Rankings of 500 Cities Ahead of London CITIES BECOME SMARTER AS TECH SOLVES CITY PROBLEMS OF 2 GLOBE-SHAKING TRENDS – 2thinknow EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY 5:11 PM EDT (New York) / THURSDAY 20:11 PM CET (Paris) / FRIDAY 4:11 AM AEST (Melbourne) 2thinknow // MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA – Tokyo was the first Asian city named the world’s most innovative city in 2018 of 500 cities in the 11th annual Innovation Cities Index released by data innovation agency 2thinknow in Melbourne today. The top five in the city ranking included previous winners London (won 2015, 2017), Silicon Valley (San Francisco-San Jose) and New York, followed by Los Angeles. Singapore rose one place behind previous early double winner Boston, Toronto, Paris and Sydney rounding out the global top ten. Sydney was also the first Australian city in the top ten and marked the first time three cities in the top ten had been located in the Asia region. According to the analysts Tokyo's gradual climb was also based off strong baseline performance average across the broad-base of 162 city indicators used to score the cities, and a focus on applied technology as a unique solution to current urban opportunities and challenges. Behind the rankings is the analysis that cities with higher rates of innovation will experience higher economic output and be perceived as the best destinations to invest in commercial product, service or social innovation without a specific industry focus. “What really surprised us this year, was the resurgence of Tokyo, moving up to eclipse rival cities like Boston. They showed clear direction by embracing smart technology change to lead innovation, and leadership in what we have identified as the twin long-term globe shaking trends of robotics and 3D manufacturing.” 2thinknow’s Director Data, Christopher Hire stated. “While it was close between London and Tokyo, support of new technologies gave it to Tokyo based on 2018 trends, although this could change in 2019.” The Innovation Cities Index has been published annually since 2007 by commercial data provider 2thinknow to measure each cities pre-conditions for innovation using 162 indicators is based on commercial data points sold to corporations. CLASSIFYING CITIES GLOBALLY The city ranking classified five hundred cities into four bands for innovation based on trend-adjusted scores derived from 162 indicators annually benchmarked and reduced to three factor scores for measuring conditions conducive to creating a process of innovation in a city. The top band was ‘Nexus’ cities of which there were 52 cities (approximately top 10%). There were 120 cities in the next ‘Hub’ category (about 25%). 256 cities (or about 50% of cities considered) were in the next globally competitive ‘Node’ category. According to the research model ‘Nexus’ cities remain the optimal locations for innovation of a general nature, and Hub cities remain optimal for innovation in a few key industry segments. After the classification process, the cities are ranked by the analysts. TOP GLOBAL ‘NEXUS’ CITIES In North America, there were 23 Nexus cities compared with 19 last year, indicated renewed United States and Canadian cities dominance of innovation. Cities that improved dramatically in the ranking included Chicago (11), Dallas-Fort Worth (13), Seattle (15), Houston (17), Austin (29), Denver (31) and Philadelphia (32) due to favorable trends and improved economic development. In Europe there were 19 Nexus cities, reversed from 24 cities last year due to declined economic conditions providing a slower market rate of adoption of innovations according to the analysts. There were fewer rising cities in Europe, but some included Berlin (13), Oslo (36) and Rome (47). Last year’s high-ranked European capitals that fell but retained high positions Amsterdam (18), Vienna (19), Munich (21), Barcelona (30), Madrid (38), Copenhagen (39) and Milan (40). This was due to less favorable trends and distractions from a local policy focus on economic development and innovation during the period, according to the analysts. As in 2017, nine of the top Nexus cities remained in Asia, including Seoul (12), Hong Kong (27), Shanghai (35) now topping Beijing (37) and Osaka (45). Dubai (33) remained the only Emerging Nexus city, although Tel Aviv remain highly ranked (44) competitor in the Mid-East region, with the next regional city being Abu Dhabi (69), trailed by Kuwait City (268) and Doha (294). Africa’s top innovator remained Cape Town (265) and Johannesburg (380) although both cities declined due to the economic implications of recent policies. REGION - AMERICAS SILICON VALLEY STORY OF SATELLITE CITIES In the United States, Los Angeles and a series of Bay Area satellite cities such as San Diego (23), Portland (41), Oakland (up 12 places to 43), Sacramento (up 21 places to 59) and Santa-Ana-Anaheim (up 37 places) reinforced their destination attractiveness to tech companies priced out of the San Francisco Bay Area in the analysis. Oakland was noted as especially significant, having capitalized on the success of being in the Bay Area while having a distinct city program and overcome past economic issues. NORTH AMERICA TECH RESURGENCE “This year innovation is likely to come from large cities as usual, but we found on a population-adjusted basis many small cities are punching above their weight. It’s the year of big cities with physical networks and small cities with digital networks, going global,” Hire added. North American cities were represented in the top hundred cities with 37 cities in the United States, 5 in Canada and Mexico City (73) being the new winner in Latin America, replacing Sao Paulo and Rio De Janeiro. This left 43 cities within the top 100 in the NAFTA Zone. Larger Canadian cities continued their top rankings with few changes including Montréal (22), Vancouver (25) and Québec City (58) due to higher costs. Lower business costs and improved innovation policies lead Ottawa (126), Halifax (202) and Hamilton (205) to achieve above average positions relative to their smaller populations with potential to improve in future years. Outside the top hundred innovation efforts by cities like Detroit’s (80) neighboring small city Ann Arbor (up 51 places to 114) and Des Moines in Iowa (up 26 places) could be seen in their movements. The analysts noted the start-up and tech scenes appearing in American cities as providing “strong grass roots of opportunity positivity in the U.S. economy”. A lot of this was noted as due to the movement of new product ideas “as a service” e.g. SAAS (Software as A Service), FAAS (Fashion as A Service) or MAAS (Mobility as A Service) enabling new ways of monetizing undervalued assets in the digital economy. LATIN TECH TANGO CHALLENGE The top 10 Latin American cities moved up an average of 11 places each, showing that Latin American capitals were challenging and growing distinct identities from cities of the United States. The fastest movers were Bogota (up 46 places) and Santiago (up 23 places) off improved start-up and more stable business policies. REGION - EUROPE BREXIT WEAKENS EUROPE NOT UK Because the Index factored in economic performance, Europe scored fewer cities than usual with 35 in the top hundred but with improved performance by Stockholm (28), Oslo (36), recovering Athens (62) and Lisbon (rising 17 places to 90). Strong mobility solutions (such as an embedded fast rail network) were noted as a key performance differentiator enabling European cities to maintain a strong performance across the data-set. Sustainability performance also played a big part in European cities strong performance when smaller populations are accounted for. The number of cities reduced further to 27 for Continental Europe, once the four Brexit cities of London, Manchester (34, up 11 places), Edinburgh (89) and Glasgow (95) and four other non-continental cities are excluded – Tel Aviv (44), Istanbul (53), Moscow (48) and Saint Petersburg (93). Outside the top 100 often-overlooked Liverpool (up 22 places to 129) and Leeds (up 13 places to 150) proved that London’s recent last few years of innovation success had now begun transferring to other cities in the United Kingdom. The European Union had 25% of the cities in the top hundred once Helsinki and Zürich are excluded (not European Union members). REGION – ASIA & OCEANIA ASIAN INNOVATION SPIKY The total number of top hundred cities in Asia fell by one to 18 from 19, due to Perth (now 105) and Guangzhou (113) being jumped by newcomer Wellington (100). Overall top 100 cities in Asia region improved by an average of three places, and five places in the top 35% of all cities. Analysts attributed to a ‘spike’ factor of wealth concentration in Asian society, reflecting a greater concentration of innovation to fewer locations in Asia, compared with the greater distribution more equitably within European society. In practice, this means location matters more in starting new ideas in Asia than Europe or the United States. Beyond Nexus cities, other key Hub cities in Asia region included Brisbane (54), Shenzhen (55), Taipei (60), Kyoto (64), Busan (68) and Kuala Lumpur (99). In Australia, more overlooked regional and smaller capital cities marched upwards such as Canberra (152), Adelaide (163), Gold Coast (198), Wollongong (262, up 38 places), Hobart (264, up 20 places) and Newcastle (up 27 places to 309) because of broadband access to global services. The top Indian cities for innovation were Mumbai (92) and Bangalore (139), with Delhi at (199). ANALYST FUTURE PREDICTIONS - RECOVERY WHERE NEXT “Our index is often a lead index – in 2009, we predicted the resilience of German cities, events in Ukraine, and the GFC, as we last year correctly predicting the ongoing recovery of Athens based on the Index. Cities that do well in our index can go on to be recognized in other indexes. This year we are predicting that Thessaloniki will continue to recover rapidly having risen 71 places.” “We also predict that French cities have hit bottom based on their current scores and should rebound in 18-24 months. German cities have declined this year but may improve in 2-3 years.” “If the United States avoids any damaging conflicts, U.S. cities should continue to grow, and an economic turnaround in Europe is already under way. Asian cities will continue to be less numerically represented but power will be concentrated into a few key Asian centers,” Hire ended. BACKGROUND All indexes are published on
MEDIA RELEASE: First Asian City Wins 11th Annual Innovation Cities™ Index City Rankings from 500 cities
MEDIA RELEASE: First Asian City Wins 11th…
MEDIA RELEASE: First Asian City Wins 11th Annual Innovation Cities™ Index City Rankings from 500 cities
MEDIA RELEASE | ABOUT 2thinknow | NOTES FOR EDITORS | CITY RANKINGS TABLES Robot Capital Tokyo Wins 11th Annual City Rankings of 500 Cities Ahead of London CITIES BECOME SMARTER AS TECH SOLVES CITY PROBLEMS OF 2 GLOBE-SHAKING TRENDS – 2thinknow EMBARGOED UNTIL THURSDAY 5:11 PM EDT (New York) / THURSDAY 20:11 PM CET (Paris) / FRIDAY 4:11 AM AEST (Melbourne) 2thinknow // MELBOURNE, AUSTRALIA – Tokyo was the first Asian city named the world’s most innovative city in 2018 of 500 cities in the 11th annual Innovation Cities Index released by data innovation agency 2thinknow in Melbourne today. The top five in the city ranking included previous winners London (won 2015, 2017), Silicon Valley (San Francisco-San Jose) and New York, followed by Los Angeles. Singapore rose one place behind previous early double winner Boston, Toronto, Paris and Sydney rounding out the global top ten. Sydney was also the first Australian city in the top ten and marked the first time three cities in the top ten had been located in the Asia region. According to the analysts Tokyo's gradual climb was also based off strong baseline performance average across the broad-base of 162 city indicators used to score the cities, and a focus on applied technology as a unique solution to current urban opportunities and challenges. Behind the rankings is the analysis that cities with higher rates of innovation will experience higher economic output and be perceived as the best destinations to invest in commercial product, service or social innovation without a specific industry focus. “What really surprised us this year, was the resurgence of Tokyo, moving up to eclipse rival cities like Boston. They showed clear direction by embracing smart technology change to lead innovation, and leadership in what we have identified as the twin long-term globe shaking trends of robotics and 3D manufacturing.” 2thinknow’s Director Data, Christopher Hire stated. “While it was close between London and Tokyo, support of new technologies gave it to Tokyo based on 2018 trends, although this could change in 2019.” The Innovation Cities Index has been published annually since 2007 by commercial data provider 2thinknow to measure each cities pre-conditions for innovation using 162 indicators is based on commercial data points sold to corporations. CLASSIFYING CITIES GLOBALLY The city ranking classified five hundred cities into four bands for innovation based on trend-adjusted scores derived from 162 indicators annually benchmarked and reduced to three factor scores for measuring conditions conducive to creating a process of innovation in a city. The top band was ‘Nexus’ cities of which there were 52 cities (approximately top 10%). There were 120 cities in the next ‘Hub’ category (about 25%). 256 cities (or about 50% of cities considered) were in the next globally competitive ‘Node’ category. According to the research model ‘Nexus’ cities remain the optimal locations for innovation of a general nature, and Hub cities remain optimal for innovation in a few key industry segments. After the classification process, the cities are ranked by the analysts. TOP GLOBAL ‘NEXUS’ CITIES In North America, there were 23 Nexus cities compared with 19 last year, indicated renewed United States and Canadian cities dominance of innovation. Cities that improved dramatically in the ranking included Chicago (11), Dallas-Fort Worth (13), Seattle (15), Houston (17), Austin (29), Denver (31) and Philadelphia (32) due to favorable trends and improved economic development. In Europe there were 19 Nexus cities, reversed from 24 cities last year due to declined economic conditions providing a slower market rate of adoption of innovations according to the analysts. There were fewer rising cities in Europe, but some included Berlin (13), Oslo (36) and Rome (47). Last year’s high-ranked European capitals that fell but retained high positions Amsterdam (18), Vienna (19), Munich (21), Barcelona (30), Madrid (38), Copenhagen (39) and Milan (40). This was due to less favorable trends and distractions from a local policy focus on economic development and innovation during the period, according to the analysts. As in 2017, nine of the top Nexus cities remained in Asia, including Seoul (12), Hong Kong (27), Shanghai (35) now topping Beijing (37) and Osaka (45). Dubai (33) remained the only Emerging Nexus city, although Tel Aviv remain highly ranked (44) competitor in the Mid-East region, with the next regional city being Abu Dhabi (69), trailed by Kuwait City (268) and Doha (294). Africa’s top innovator remained Cape Town (265) and Johannesburg (380) although both cities declined due to the economic implications of recent policies. REGION - AMERICAS SILICON VALLEY STORY OF SATELLITE CITIES In the United States, Los Angeles and a series of Bay Area satellite cities such as San Diego (23), Portland (41), Oakland (up 12 places to 43), Sacramento (up 21 places to 59) and Santa-Ana-Anaheim (up 37 places) reinforced their destination attractiveness to tech companies priced out of the San Francisco Bay Area in the analysis. Oakland was noted as especially significant, having capitalized on the success of being in the Bay Area while having a distinct city program and overcome past economic issues. NORTH AMERICA TECH RESURGENCE “This year innovation is likely to come from large cities as usual, but we found on a population-adjusted basis many small cities are punching above their weight. It’s the year of big cities with physical networks and small cities with digital networks, going global,” Hire added. North American cities were represented in the top hundred cities with 37 cities in the United States, 5 in Canada and Mexico City (73) being the new winner in Latin America, replacing Sao Paulo and Rio De Janeiro. This left 43 cities within the top 100 in the NAFTA Zone. Larger Canadian cities continued their top rankings with few changes including Montréal (22), Vancouver (25) and Québec City (58) due to higher costs. Lower business costs and improved innovation policies lead Ottawa (126), Halifax (202) and Hamilton (205) to achieve above average positions relative to their smaller populations with potential to improve in future years. Outside the top hundred innovation efforts by cities like Detroit’s (80) neighboring small city Ann Arbor (up 51 places to 114) and Des Moines in Iowa (up 26 places) could be seen in their movements. The analysts noted the start-up and tech scenes appearing in American cities as providing “strong grass roots of opportunity positivity in the U.S. economy”. A lot of this was noted as due to the movement of new product ideas “as a service” e.g. SAAS (Software as A Service), FAAS (Fashion as A Service) or MAAS (Mobility as A Service) enabling new ways of monetizing undervalued assets in the digital economy. LATIN TECH TANGO CHALLENGE The top 10 Latin American cities moved up an average of 11 places each, showing that Latin American capitals were challenging and growing distinct identities from cities of the United States. The fastest movers were Bogota (up 46 places) and Santiago (up 23 places) off improved start-up and more stable business policies. REGION - EUROPE BREXIT WEAKENS EUROPE NOT UK Because the Index factored in economic performance, Europe scored fewer cities than usual with 35 in the top hundred but with improved performance by Stockholm (28), Oslo (36), recovering Athens (62) and Lisbon (rising 17 places to 90). Strong mobility solutions (such as an embedded fast rail network) were noted as a key performance differentiator enabling European cities to maintain a strong performance across the data-set. Sustainability performance also played a big part in European cities strong performance when smaller populations are accounted for. The number of cities reduced further to 27 for Continental Europe, once the four Brexit cities of London, Manchester (34, up 11 places), Edinburgh (89) and Glasgow (95) and four other non-continental cities are excluded – Tel Aviv (44), Istanbul (53), Moscow (48) and Saint Petersburg (93). Outside the top 100 often-overlooked Liverpool (up 22 places to 129) and Leeds (up 13 places to 150) proved that London’s recent last few years of innovation success had now begun transferring to other cities in the United Kingdom. The European Union had 25% of the cities in the top hundred once Helsinki and Zürich are excluded (not European Union members). REGION – ASIA & OCEANIA ASIAN INNOVATION SPIKY The total number of top hundred cities in Asia fell by one to 18 from 19, due to Perth (now 105) and Guangzhou (113) being jumped by newcomer Wellington (100). Overall top 100 cities in Asia region improved by an average of three places, and five places in the top 35% of all cities. Analysts attributed to a ‘spike’ factor of wealth concentration in Asian society, reflecting a greater concentration of innovation to fewer locations in Asia, compared with the greater distribution more equitably within European society. In practice, this means location matters more in starting new ideas in Asia than Europe or the United States. Beyond Nexus cities, other key Hub cities in Asia region included Brisbane (54), Shenzhen (55), Taipei (60), Kyoto (64), Busan (68) and Kuala Lumpur (99). In Australia, more overlooked regional and smaller capital cities marched upwards such as Canberra (152), Adelaide (163), Gold Coast (198), Wollongong (262, up 38 places), Hobart (264, up 20 places) and Newcastle (up 27 places to 309) because of broadband access to global services. The top Indian cities for innovation were Mumbai (92) and Bangalore (139), with Delhi at (199). ANALYST FUTURE PREDICTIONS - RECOVERY WHERE NEXT “Our index is often a lead index – in 2009, we predicted the resilience of German cities, events in Ukraine, and the GFC, as we last year correctly predicting the ongoing recovery of Athens based on the Index. Cities that do well in our index can go on to be recognized in other indexes. This year we are predicting that Thessaloniki will continue to recover rapidly having risen 71 places.” “We also predict that French cities have hit bottom based on their current scores and should rebound in 18-24 months. German cities have declined this year but may improve in 2-3 years.” “If the United States avoids any damaging conflicts, U.S. cities should continue to grow, and an economic turnaround in Europe is already under way. Asian cities will continue to be less numerically represented but power will be concentrated into a few key Asian centers,” Hire ended. BACKGROUND All indexes are published on
Comments on this post are for paid subscribers